Does race matter?

Race plays a big role in our society. But what is it? Is it just our skin colour or something more complex? Some feel we need it to understand events of the past, but it also causes conflict all over the world… 

Race through history...

Is race biological?

Does race matter? From a purely biological and genetic perspective, no. There are no divisions within the human species that can be classed as races. However, this hasn't always been the understanding in biology...
 

More

From the time of early exploration, naturalists (who studied living organisms) and biologists have tried to classify the different human populations they came into contact with as belonging to certain racial groups. This was done according to physical features, which were usually chosen without logical reason. 

Phenotype and racial divisions

In biology, physical characteristics are known as phenotypes. Phenotypes are a combination of your genotype – a collection of genes that determine one particular feature – and your environment. So, for example, your weight is a phenotype affected by both your genes and your diet.

Genotype plus environment equals phenotype

Your genes and your environment make you who you are. Image credit: Keith Chan via Wikimedia Commons

Early racial divisions in the 17th-18th centuries were based on physical features (usually skull measurements) linked to geographical region of origin. François Bernier, a French physician, was one of the first to categorise race this way, into Europeans, Far Easterners, Negroes and Lapps. Later, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a German physician and naturalist, named five races on the basis of skull profile: Caucasian, Mongoloid, Negroid, Malay and American. This gave rise to the ideas of monogenism and polygenism, which considered whether the different races all came from a single origin (monogenism) or from different origins (polygenism). 

Unfortunately, differences in physical characteristics and supposed differences in moral character, came to be used to justify practices such as the slave trade and other examples of racism. The idea that the different races had originated separately, and that some were inferior to others, also made it easy for racism to thrive. 

Illustration of Blumenbach’s five skullsBlumenbach’s five skulls are labeled (from left to right) Tungusae, Caribaci, Feminae Georgianae, Otaheitae, and Aethiopissae. These were presented as examples of the five races: Mongolian, American, Caucasian, Malay, and Ethiopian.

Evolution and our journey out of Africa

In the 19th century, Charles Darwin presented his theory of evolution and concluded that all humans came from a single common ancestor. 

Darwin recognised that we are far more similar than we are different. This has been confirmed by modern day genetic analysis. We now know that any human is about 99.5% genetically similar to any other human. Not only that, but people within populations show more genetic variation than those between populations. Sub-Saharan African populations show the greatest genetic diversity, which makes sense when we consider that humans evolved in Africa. Those who migrated out of Africa were smaller populations, and so carried with them only a part of the genetic diversity. 

Evolution from a single ancestor has typically been portrayed as a tree, with different groups splitting off at different times through history, followed by no further mixture. In this way, Africans have been shown to have split off from the rest of humanity a long time ago, and therefore are a distinct lineage, or “race”. 

A more modern way of looking at the evolution of humans is known as the ‘multiregional hypothesis’. This suggests that several waves of expansion out of Africa occurred at different times, and there was gene flow back and forth between populations. 

Gene flow, or gene migration, is the transfer of genes from one population to another via immigration of individuals. Take a look at the diagram below:
Diagram showing gene flow of two populationsImage credit: Jessica Krueger via Wikimedia Commons

So what is race, and how is it actually defined? 

On a biological level, it is a division lower on the scale than sub-species. All humans belong to the same species and sub-species, Homo sapiens. 

A biological race, by definition, is a genetically distinct division, usually across some geographical boundary. That said, because of the very gradual genetic variations across geographical areas (called ‘clinal’ changes), no human “races” fit this definition.   

Generally, it's found that those geographically closer to each other are more similar than those geographically distant from one another, but the changes are gradual. So gradual that the more traits you measure and the more human populations you measure, the more categories of human beings you have to make! At one point it was even said that there were up to 65 human races.  

There aren’t any single genetic differences between races, where the one race has one variant of a gene and the other has another. In fact, as shown by Craig Venter and his team when they sequenced the human genome, it's possible for a Korean and a white American to be more similar to each other genetically than two white Americans.

What we perceive to be physical racial differences are simply a result of adaptations due to natural selection over thousands of years. The subset of genes to which these differences are due is too small and is not variable enough to be classified as racially distinct. In light of this, there has been a call for the term “race” to be replaced by “ancestry” in the biological literature. 

If you want to learn more about the science of differences in skin colour, take a look at the video below by Angela Koine Flynn and Tomás Pichardo-Espaillat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r4c2NT4naQ&t=40s

Or is it a social idea created by people?

Generally, we understand each other when we talk about race – so if it isn’t biological, what is it? 
 

More

Since race has been separated from biology, scientists and philosophers have argued that race is a social construct. A social construct is an idea that is created and accepted by society or a social group. Some important examples include government, laws, and marriage, as well as race and gender. While all these things are socially constructed, they still have a big impact on our daily lives.

Also they're not fixed. Over time, society’s concept of what a government is for, how they should be formed and the power they have, has changed. Likewise, our understanding of race has changed a lot over time.

Does that mean that race isn’t real? 

It all depends on how you define 'real'. Race isn’t real in the sense that an apple is real, or a car is real. But there are lots of other social constructs that we would most definitely say are real. The value of money is a social construct, created by society so we could trade goods, and I think we would all agree that money is very real.

However, there is a question over whether race is ‘less real’ than things like apples and cars. And if we think it is less real, does that mean it’s less important? Should we stop using the word 'race' altogether? 

Writer, Jenée Desmond Harris explores this idea further in the video below: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnfKgffCZ7U

Why do we need to talk about race?

If biologists aren’t using the term anymore, should we? Here are some of the key arguments for and against this. 

Eliminativists argue that we should abandon the concept of race because the term race is historically linked to biological groupings, and there are no such distinct biological groups that match our modern day concept of racial groups.

For example, there are certain genetic markers, such as skin colour, that we use to identify race, but not every person of the same skin colour is part of the same race. Plus, there are people within races that have variation in skin colour. There are lots of other examples of physical traits, such as eye shape and hair texture, that only complicate this further.

However, other philosophers, called race constructivists, say that we should keep the concept of race.

Unfortunately, society already labels, and sometimes discriminates against people according to racial categories. Race constructivists argue that we need the term race so we can make social and political progress against racial injustice. We've seen some of the negative effects that racism can have in the recent police brutality cases in America, and the development of the Black Lives Matter movement that followed. To learn about this, take a look in the additional resources at the '#BlackLivesMatter' video.  

It’s quite clear that it would be impossible to entirely remove the concept of race from society, but many believe there is work to be done to ensure we are only using concepts of race to fight racism, and not to divide people further. 

Race and ethnicity – what’s the difference?

While race is based upon perceived physical traits, ethnicity is linked to cultural traits (for example, language, religion, forms of dress and customs) and shared group ancestry. In many ways, ethnicity is more flexible than race, as people can choose the ethnicity they most identify with based upon their ancestry, geographical location and culture. 

Ethnicity is a term much more commonly used by governments, healthcare and in the legal system to identify different groups. Many people believe it's a better term to use as it's not influenced by a history of conflict and segregation. If we were to eliminate our concept of race, ethnicity may be a good substitute as it would still enable us to track social progress. Employers and other institutions, like universities and schools, use ethnicity data to ensure they are being fair in their recruitment and selection processes, and that people from all backgrounds are given equal opportunities. 

What do you think? 

Kofi Annan, Nobel Peace Prize winner and previous Secretary-General of the United Nations, once said: "We may have different religions, different languages, different colored skin, but we all belong to one human race."

Kofi Annan, Nobel Peace Prize winner and previous Secretary-General of the United Nations, once said: "We may have different religions, different languages, different colored skin, but we all belong to one human race."

Race by numbers

It's pretty hard to define race, and so the term 'ethnicity' is generally used by governments, businesses and public services. The UK government collects data about its population every 10 years in a record called a census. It was last performed in 2011. Take a look at what ethnic diversity in the UK was like then...

More

Ethnicity in the UK 

This map shows the proportion of each ethnic group in the UK from the 2011 census. How do you think these numbers might have changed since 2011? Is it important that we collect data about ethnicity?

Map of the UK with % of each ethnicity

Ethnicity by age

This graphic shows the percentage of White and BAME (*Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic) populations at different ages in the UK. There is more ethnic diversity amongst young people than amongst older people, why do you think this is? 

Graphic showing ethnicity in the UK by age

Ethnicity across London

These maps of London shows the percentage of Black, Asian and White populations in each of the London Boroughs. You can also see the Boroughs with the highest and lowest proportion of each ethnic population. How do you think these maps would have looked 50 years ago? How might they look in 50 years time?

Map of London showing percentage of Black population in each BoroughMap of London showing percentage of Asian population in each BoroughMap of London showing percentage of Whitepopulation in each Borough

Sources:

2011 census data - Office of National Statistics

2011 ethnicity by age - nomis official labour market statistics

2011 ethnicity by London Borough - London Datastore

Image: Blank map of London Borough (modified) Author: Richtom80 via English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 2.5)

5 multiracial stories: through their eyes

  1. Still I Rise by Maya Angelou
    1. Maya Angelou (1928-2014) lived through times of terrible inequality for African American people. She was active in the Civil Rights Movement (which aimed to end racial segregation and discrimination) and worked alongside Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Angelou wrote one of her most powerful poems, Still I Rise, in 1994. This poem directly addresses white oppressors of black people, which can be seen from her use of ‘You’ throughout. In the face of hatred, Angelou presents her determination to stand up for other black people, and her black ancestors. In this particular section of the poem, she tells society that no matter what they do to try to oppress her, they won't succeed:

      "You may shoot me with your words,
      You may cut me with your eyes,
      You may kill me with your hatefulness,
      But still, like air, I’ll rise."

  2. Theme for English B. by Langston Hughes
    1. Langston Hughes (1902-1967) was a poet and activist who joined and helped lead the Harlem Renaissance. This movement spanned from about 1918 until the mid-1930s and is often described as an explosion of literature, music, theatre, and the visual arts among African Americans in Harlem, New York City. Later in his life, in 1949, Hughes wrote Theme for English B. This poem explores how a black student might (or might not) relate to his white teacher. The student in the poem is asked to write a page about himself, and the only instruction is to make this page ‘true’. The student questions the assignment, and its apparent simplicity, and asks if the ‘truth’ means the same thing to him as it does to his white teacher. In this section, Hughes wonders about the differences and similarities between black and white people, in both their lives and their writing.

      "Well, I like to eat, sleep, drink, and be in love.   
      I like to work, read, learn, and understand life.   
      I like a pipe for a Christmas present,
      or records—Bessie, bop, or Bach.
      I guess being colored
      doesn’t make me not like
      the same things other folks like who are other races.   
      So will my page be 
      colored that I write?   
      Being me, it will not be white."

  3. Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
    1. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie was born in Nigeria in 1977. Her 2013 novel, Americanah, tells the story of a teenage couple at a secondary school in Lagos (the largest city in Nigeria). At the time, Nigeria is under a military dictatorship (ruled by one person), and citizens are trying to leave the country. One of the teenagers, Ifemulu, travels to the USA to study, whilst the other, Obinze, goes to London. The two have opposing experiences during their time apart in two countries with very different histories. In American, Ifemulu struggles with her experiences of race and racism. Adichie (as Ifemulu) writes:

      “The only reason you say that race was not an issue is because you wish it was not. We all wish it was not. But it’s a lie. I came from a country where race was not an issue; I did not think of myself as black and I only became black when I came to America. When you are black in America and you fall in love with a white person, race doesn’t matter when you’re alone together because it’s just you and your love. But the minute you step outside, race matters.” 

      Across the Atlantic, Obinze has very different encounters, faced with British politeness glossing over talk of race and a heavy focus on political correctness. Will they revive their relationship when they return to Nigeria?

  4. The Boy with the Topknot by Sathnam Sanghera
    1. Sathnam Sanghera was born to Punjabi parents in Wolverhampton in 1976. In this memoir, he writes about growing up as a second generation immigrant in the 80s, and his journey to studying at Cambridge University and gaining a highly-paid job as a newspaper journalist in London. The central thread of the story is Sanghera’s return to Wolverhampton in his 20s and his discovery that two of his family members have been struggling with mental health issues. In 2009, The Boy with the Topknot was awarded Book of the Year by the charity MIND, which recognises books and authors that have raised awareness of mental health issues in their literary work. When he accepted the award, Sanghera said "there are hardly any books about Asian communities’ experiences of mental health problems, so I hope people read this book and it leads to more understanding.”

  5. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian by Sherman Alexie
    1. Sherman Alexie grew up on the Spokane Indian Reservation in Washington, USA. Alexie wrote this young adult novel from the perspective of a Native American teenager, known as “Junior”, exploring his life on the reservation and his decision to study at an all-white public high school (rather than the poor high school on his reservation). This experience introduces him to the differences between white culture and his own, particularly noticing how much stronger family ties are in his community. Throughout the school year, however, he also sees some of the darker sides of reservation culture as he loses family members to alcohol abuse. Junior relates in some way to both the Indian/Native American and American side of himself, but has difficulty establishing his individuality, as represented by this quote from the book:

      “Life is a constant struggle between being an individual and being a member of the community.”